|
ARTICLES
Visit my blog for Rolfing®
Structural Integration
videos.
LOW BACK PAIN AND DYSFUNCTION OVERVIEW, ASSESSMENT &
TREATMENT
Clay Cox, Ph.D.
Board Certified in Diagnosis and
Treatment of Soft Tissue
Injuries Resulting from Motor
Vehicle Accidents: American
Academy of Craniofacial Pain
American Academy of Pain
Management: Fellow Clinical
Practitioner American Back
Society Fellow
Certified Advanced Rolfer™
ă2002
“Beyond all doubt the use of the
human hand, as a method of
reducing human suffering, is the
oldest remedy known to man…”
John McM. Mennel, MD
Preface
It will be
assumed by this writer that the
reader is well founded in
functional anatomy and the
involved in a practice of Manual
Medicine. I will present issues
that I believe are not commonly
covered in basic anatomy or
training courses. I offer this
presentation as fodder, raw
material for artistic creation.
Please do not take this as a
manual on how to fix low backs.
I am not sure that low back pain
can be “fixed.” Some heals
itself with time. Sometimes we
can relieve symptoms and reduce
suffering. Sometimes all we can
do is to help others help
themselves.
It is my
hope that my efforts here will
spurn you on to make your own
inquisition starting where I
have left off. For those taking
on the journey: God speed and
God bless you. For the rest, I
hope you find this informative
and maybe even entertaining.
I defined a
practice of Manual Medicine as
being a forum through which a
practitioner. utilizing a
multimodality approach, assists
others in relieving their
discomfort, dysfunction, and
pain. The particular
combination of modalities
available for use will be
dependent upon each individual
practitioner, their skills,
their interests and their
training. In many cases, it
will also involve psychological,
energetic, emotional and
spiritual endeavors as well.
Overview
It is far
beyond the scope of this paper
to review all that has been
written on low back pain since
the mid-19th century. As of 1993
there were over 7000
publications discussing low back
pain and the literature (1).
I would
like to present an overview of
low back pain and include a
discussion on mechanisms, pain
generators, assessment and
treatment protocols that I have
developed over the years. It is
my hope that with this
information the reader might
better understand the nature of
low back pain and more
efficiently facilitate the
patient’s effort to ease or end
their suffering.
Visit
my blog for Rolfing® Structural
Integration
videos..
Introduction
Back Pain Generalities
Nearly 80 percent of adults are
affected by back pain at some
point in their lives. It is one
of the most common reasons for
hospitalization in the United
States. For many years, we
assumed that back pain was
usually the result of spinal
degeneration or injury,
especially damage to the
intervertebral discs.
It is now believed that the
leading cause of back pain is
simple muscle strain. Although
symptoms may come on suddenly
and can be acutely painful, this
is actually a problem that
develops over a long period of
time. When muscles contract,
lactic acid and pyruvic acid are
produced as byproducts of
muscular activity. It is the
presence of lactic acid in the
muscles that produces the
familiar sensation of muscle
fatigue following strenuous
activity (2).
Common Causes
of Low Back Pain
Poor
posture is a common cause for
low back pain. A slouching
posture, flexion, puts pressure
on the anulus. An exaggerated
to low back curve, extension,
over a period of time, can
strain and inflamed the facet
joints. As a result, the low
back musculature tightens and
usually goes into spasm to
support the back adding to or
creating low back pain.
It is
interesting to note that if you
divide humans into two groups
squatters and not squatters you
find that the squatters have
considerably less the
degenerative disc problems when
compared do not squatters.
These findings suggest that
lordosis is implicated in the
pathogenesis of degeneration of
lumbar disc (3).
The lack of
exercise leads to poor muscle
tone and spinal instability,
thereby creating a prime
opportunity for injury to the
low back during regular and
mundane in activities.
Overeating to the point of
abdominal distention and pelvic
tilting is also common cause of
low back pain in the American
population in a wide range of
ages.
Other Causes
Include:
Back
Strains or Sprains are
usually a result of common
activities done improperly such
as bending, lifting, standing,
or sitting.
Ruptured
Discs are famous for causing
severe back pain. The nucleus
of the disc may bulge and press
on a nerve root in its tough
capsule. It may herniate through
the capsule and pin spinal
nerves against a bony part of
the spine. Radicular pain down
the back of the thigh and leg is
commonly referred to as
sciatica. The first level of
complaint of this malady is
sensory, such as pain, numbness,
or tingling. The second and
more serious level of complaint
from the patient is motor
function weakness or loss of
use. Some patients do well
without surgery. Some benefit
from a laminectomy, diskectomy,
or spinal fusion.
Facet
Irritation: Osteoarthritis
narrows the articulating space
and produces irritating spurs on
the vertebral bodies. Over
time, as discs wear out,
osteophytes form and facets
begin to inflame, causing pain.
This condition may cause or
worsen stenosis, which
eventually irritates the nearby
nerves, causing more pain.
Tension
and Emotional Problems such
as money worries, family
pressures and fatigue can
actually cause back pain as
well.
Other
Causes for low back pain
include spondylosis or other
degenerative changes in the
spine and spondylolisthesis
where repeated lumbar extensions
eventually cause vertebra to
slip anterior and posterior,
producing stress fractures. The
result is a stretched disc that
puts pressure on the anulus,
irritating nerve roots. Both of
these conditions are low back
pain generators.
Kidney,
bladder, and prostate problems,
female public disorders, and
even constipation may produce
back pain. Back pain can also
be the result of improper
footwear, poor walking habits,
improper lifting, straining,
calcium deficiency, slouching
while standing or sitting, and
sleeping on a mattress that's
too soft. Chronic conditions
that cause back pain include
arthritis, rheumatism, bone
disease, and abnormal curvature
of the spine. Fractures are
rarely the cause of back pain.
PAIN
I would
like to add a few comments on
personal style here. This is
the beginning of an ongoing
relationship with someone who is
suffering. They have come to
you because you're seen as an
authority. You are paid to
perform a personal service with
people. You know more about
relieving pain and suffering by
putting your hands on people
than most other physicians of
any kind. I call you physicians
because you help relieve people
suffering. You happen to do it
by touching them in a knowing
and caring manner. The
relationship that you establish
with the person before you will
finish as it begins. Just like
the Basic Series: do a great
first hour and the rest will
follow.
Both
Rolfing and pain management are
functions of interacting with
another individual. Be a great
listener, you'll learn their
respect as a human being. Be
100% available on all three
levels of the heart, head and
hands from the very beginning to
the very end. You'll be amazed
at the results.
Before
embarking in the formidable task
of assisting a patient who is
suffering from low back pain, or
any other pain condition for
that matter, you need to take a
competent case history, do an
appropriate physical
examination, make a treatment
plan based on the results of the
case history and the findings of
your examination.
In taking
the case history, you will want
to make sure that this patient
is in the correct office. The
easiest screen for this is to
review the case for “red flags.
” A “red flag” in a case means
only one thing, STOP and LOOK
very carefully at this case for
appropriateness for referral to
a medical or osteopathic
physician. I have listed the
most common flags below, but
this list is not complete. Stay
on your toes and remain very
aware of what your patient tells
you during the case history
taking phase.
Danger
Signals in Low Back Pain
-
Bladder
or bowel dysfunction
-
Impotence
-
Weakness
of ankle dorsiflexion
-
Ankle
clonus
-
Color
change in the extremity
-
Considerable night pain
unrelieved by rest
-
Constant
and progressive symptomatology
-
Fever and
chills
-
Weight
loss
-
Lymphadenopathy
-
Distended
abdominal veins
-
Buttock
claudication
.
Tissue
Sources of Pain
The primary
sources of pain are: (1) soft
tissue: nerves, ligaments,
tendons, and muscles; (2) facet
damage or inflammation; (3)
damaged/injured disk
structures. Understand that
there will always be a primary
pain generator and almost as
often, there will be secondary
and tertiary pain generators
that act in concert as
supportive structures in the
bodies effort to control further
damage and or pain. This is
especially true in low back
pain. If a muscle is strained
or pulled, it may eventually
strain a functional unit
unilaterally to the point of
facilitating a subluxed or
fixated vertebra. This process
can set up a compressed nerve
scenario, which starts another
level of muscle contracture and
the myospastic cycle is
initiated.
As we are
all to well aware of, everything
is connected. Understanding
these connections is the
foundation of knowledge that
makes it possible to facilitate
pain reduction. Without this
understanding, our work becomes
a patchwork affair and relief is
a matter of luck to a large
degree.
Soft Tissue
Pain
is accompanied by
tenderness, which is palpable,
but just how much the patient
suffers from that pain is very
subjective. The examiner can
also elicit to soft tissue pain
by passive stretching, but often
this motion also involves other
periarticular soft tissues.
Contracting the involved soft
tissue also can produce pain but
this contracting also produces
pressure within the disc as
well, and so this does not
represent an isolated tissue
response. In summary, there is
no laboratory or imaging study
that has confirmed myogenic
pain, so in such a finding,
subjectivity predominates (4).
Injuries to
the muscle belly or tendon
adversely affect the muscles
ability to contract fully
because of a mechanical
insufficiency or because of
pain. If the musculotendinous
unit has been mechanically
altered through partial or
complete tears, the unit can no
longer produce the forces
required to perform simple
movements. Partial tears may
create decreased force
production secondary to pain
elicited during the
contraction. Complete tears of
the unit resulted in the muscles
and ability to produce any
motion at all (5).
Strains are
indirect injuries to muscles and
tendons caused by overstretching
or tension within the fibers of
the muscle. Muscle strains
occur at the junction between
the muscle belly and an
attendant. More often than not
this happens at the distal
junction. This evidentiary
usually occurs because of a
single episode of overstretching
or overloading the muscle but is
more likely to result from
eccentric loading (6).
Tendonitis
is inflammation of the muscle
tendon. This usually occurs
because of small repetitive
forces or micro traumas being
placed in the muscle. In
chronic inflammation, the
insulted tendon thickens. In
the involve tenderness and
tendonitis are usually painful
and motion. There may be
visible swelling in their sheets
because of fluid accumulation
and/or inflammation. A lot of
attendant, localized tenderness
of variables severity can be
present (7).
Another
soft tissue pain generator is
bursitis. The bursae are fluid
filled sacs to serve to buffer
muscles, tendons, and ligaments
from other friction causing
services such as bony surfaces.
They also serve to facilitate
smooth motion. Most bursa
cannot be palpating easily
except when they are inflamed.
Inflammation usually comes about
as a result of irritation of the
bursal sac. This initial insult
can come from disease, increased
stress, friction or single
dramatic event that activates
this process. According to the
Merck Manual (8), the symptoms
included in pain, swelling and
tenderness and. A chronic
bursitis condition will cause
muscle atrophy and limited
motion will ensue.
A sprain
occurs when the structures and a
joint are stretched beyond their
anatomical limits and. This
results in the overstretching or
tearing of ligaments and/or the
joint capsule itself. It
first-degree sprained his
weather ligaments are stress
with little or no tearing. A
third-degree sprain is where the
ligaments have been completely
ruptured. This causes gross
joint instability and an empty
or absent end point in a range
of motion examination.
Subluxations occur when there's
a partial or complete
disassociation of the joints
articulating services that may
or may not return to their
normal anatomical positions.
When this occurs oftentimes
there's soft tissue damage as
well.
Dislocations occur when there's
a complete disassociation of the
joints articulating services.
When this evidentiary occurs in
the forces usually sufficient
enough to rupture many of the
soft tissue constraints
surrounding the joint.
Any
imbalance in the trunk
musculature will eventually lead
to low back pain and strain.
The musculature must be balanced
in all planes as well as in the
agonist/antagonist pairings.
The most common culprit here is
the overpowering of the lumbar
trunk musculature by the hip
flexors, namely the psoas. When
this happens, the lumbar
lordosis increases, the contents
of the pelvic bowl are dumped
adding to the low back strain
and the erector mass and the
iliolumbar triangle musculature
struggles to maintain the pelvis
in some sort of balance: a
losing battle. The other major
muscle pairs internal and
external femoral rotators and
the abductors and adductors,
obviously, have to be in balance
as well. Without balance, you
will have pain. When is the
question, not if.
Contra
lateral balance is just as
important. The right hip flexor
group must be in balance with
the left hip extensor group. If
this balance is not maintained
pelvic torsion will ensue,
followed by pain and
dysfunction. The right adductor
group must be in balance with
the left abductor group.
Obviously, this is the case with
all paired muscles. That’s most
of them, isn’t it?
Frequently,
when the balance of the external
femoral rotators is
significantly off, what is
called the “piriformis syndrome”
comes about. The primary
symptom of piriformis syndrome
is buttock pain, with or without
pain in the hamstring region
that is exacerbated by sitting
or activity. In an isolated
piriformis syndrome, the
prominent findings include
buttock region tenderness from
the sacrum to the greater
trochanter and reproduction of
but pain on the prolonged hip
flexion, abduction, and internal
rotation. Minor findings
include leg length discrepancy,
weak adductors, and painful hip
abduction while sitting.
Sometimes external rotation of
the hip while supine has also
been found to exacerbate
piriformis contracture pain,
according to Barton (9). When
you have one piriformis
contracted and not the other,
the sacrum shifts laterally on
its long axis. This creates a
painful and dysfunctional
condition in the low back
region, known as an “apex
shift.”
This muscle
acts as an abductor and external
rotator of the joint, Cox notes
that it is interesting to note
that a double insertion of the
piriformis muscle is seen in 10
to 15% of patients (10). It is
fairly common to see the
sciatica nerve or its peroneal
division passes through the
split piriformis muscle.
In
Travell’s Volume 2 she reports
that a compilation of four
cadaver studies of over 3000
bodies revealed four different
routes that the sciatic nerve
took after exiting the pelvis.
Eightyfive percent of them took
the usual route: anterior to
the piriformis. In more
than 10% of the cases, the
peroneal portion of the sciatic
nerve passed through the
muscle. In 2-3% of the
cadavers, the peroneal portion
looped superior and then
posterior to the muscle.
Finally, less than 1% of the
cadavers had the undivided
sciatic nerve penetrate the
piriformis (11). Cox (12)
found that a double insertion of
the piriformis was seen in 10 to
15% in patients and that the
sciatic nerve or at least its
peroneal division passed through
the split piriformis muscle.
Currently,
Cox reports (13) sciatica is now
believed to result of irritation
of the sciatica nerve sheaths
that is caused by biochemical
agents released from an inflamed
piriformis muscle were the two
structures meet at the sciatica
notch. The symptoms the
piriformis syndrome present are
almost identical to those of
lumbar disc syndrome. The
difference is that there is a
consistent absence of true
neurological findings.
Assessment is accomplished by
palpation of myofascial of the
trigger points within the
piriformis muscle. Traditional
allopathic treatment, which
consists of conservative
approach employing local
anesthetics in osteopathic
manipulation, is without
significant risk. Reducing
muscle spasm, restoring joint
motion, and keeping the patient
ambulatory and in motion are
keys to successful treatment.
In
discussing the lumbar
intervertebral disc syndrome,
there are four elements of the
nervous system may be involved
in the production of the
syndrome:
-
Lumbosacral nerve roots:
The nerve root is usually
irritated because of its being
stretched over a protruding or
prolapsed disc.
-
Spinal nerves: Irritation
of the spinal nerve may result
from the arthrosis of the
zygapophysial joints, the
ligamentum flavum or
hypertrophy, osteophytes,
intervertebral disc
protrusion, subluxation,
spondylolisthesis, infection,
tumor, fracture, Paget's
disease, or ankylosing
spondylitis.
-
Dorsal rami: Which supply
the zygapophyseal joints, the
erector spinae muscles and the
related fascia and skin and
the periosteum of verbal
arches pain, the multifidus
muscles, the interspinous
ligament, and interspinous
muscles are irritated by
articular facet arthrosis,
subluxation, sacroiliac joint
arthrosis, spinous process
impingement, strain of the
sacrum joints, hyperlordosis,
scoliosis, myositis, muscle
spasm, and reactions of
secondary to sclerosis or
arthrosis of the articular
facets.
-
Sinuvertebral nerves: The
SVN also known as the
recurrent meningeal nerve
supplies the posterior
longitudinal ligament as well
as the anulus fibrosus of the
disc. A descending branch
runs caudally for a maximum of
two segments, supplying the
anulus fibrosis and the
posterior longitudinal
ligament. Any lesion of the
anulus and or posterior
longitudinal ligament is
capable of setting up pain
impulses in the sinuvertebral
nerve.
“Two
basic causes of low back
pain are internal derangements
of the intervertebral disc and
irritation of the zygapophysial
articulation. The ontogeny of
low back pain concerns two
structures: the disc and the
facet.” This is from Bogduk’s
work (14), “The Anatomy of the
Lumbar Intervertebral Disc
Syndrome. ”
Facet
Pain: A number of
researchers have confirmed that
abnormalities within the facet,
or zygapophysial joint can be a
source of this persistent or
chronic pain. It is reproduced
by lumbar extension and relieved
by almost any lumbar flexion
movement. Facet pain is also
relieved by walking but
exacerbated by lumbar extension
and rotation toward the
symptomatic side according to
Cailliet (15).
The
pedicle-facet complex normally
carries only 20 percent of the
vertebral pressure applied at
the interface. This constitutes
10 times the weight per square
inch applied to the knee joint.
As the disc loses tugor and
resilience, it's also loses its
ability to resist compressive
forces and to maintain normal
and intervertebral separation
and alignment. This throws an
additional burden on the facet
articulations and may accelerate
the changes of degenerative
arthrosis (16).
Degenerative disease of the
facet joints is very common in
older people as well as in
people who have suffered lots of
low back and / or pelvic
trauma. Consequently, it is
considered a major cause of low
back pain. At the same time,
there have been many cases of
this condition in patients who
suffer no low back pain at all.
When the
patient does suffer from
degenerative disease of a facet
and has single leg symptoms,
their pain is usually more
severe, it has a longer
duration, not necessarily
traumatically induced, and
usually not relieved by bed
rest. These people have limited
lumbar extension and side
bending to the affected side
exacerbates their condition
(17).
Lumbar
Discogenic Pain:
In my work
in the field of Manual Medicine,
I have only felt comfortable
dealing with grades 1 and 2.
Grade 3 is risky business and
grade 4 is inappropriate for
work in my office. With this
means is that and comfortable
working on stabilized
spondylolisthesis. Unstable
spinal fractures in my office
make me feel nervous.
In
General:
Kuslich et
al, (18) studied pain data and
pain distributions of lumbar
structures of progressively
anesthetized patients. Here are
some of their findings:
No. 1: it
was the anulus fibrosis of the
disc that was the origin in most
cases of low back pain.
No. 2:
the facet synovium in was never
sensitive.
No. 3:
the articulating cartridge of
the facet was never sensitive
either.
No. 4:
the facet joint capsule was
tender sometimes but never
referred to the leg.
No. 5:
the end plate of the vertebra
cause a deep rather severe low
back pain when it was
compressed.
No. 6:
when the outer anulus and the
nerve root were irritated but
pain was elicited.
No. 7:
the normal nerve roots were
completely insensitive to pain.
No. 8:
low back pain was produced when
the lumbar fascia was irritated
at the supraspinous ligament.
No. 9:
the only thing they can
reproduce sciatica was the
stimulation of a swollen,
stretched or compressed nerve
root.
No. 10:
the surface of the bone, even
the periosteum was insensitive.
The spinous process, laminae and
facet both can be removed with a
rongeur without anesthetic.
No. 11:
scar tissue was insensitive to
pain stimulation. What scar
tissue does is to act to fix the
nerve root in one position,
thereby increasing the
susceptibility of the nerve root
to tension and compression.
I saved
this list for last, not because
it was the least important of
pain generators of the low back,
but because of its level of
importance. This list will be
covered in your history taking
process. You need to structure
your case history form in such a
manner that you become informed
of both the “red flags” to
mechanical work on the low back
pain patient and the pain
generators that do not have a
mechanical basis. This is a
very important list. If you
proceed to work to help
facilitate the pain reduction of
someone who has one or more of
some of these conditions when
they should be in the office of
a more appropriate physician,
you could be making a very
serious mistake with their
health and perhaps their life.
In my
practice, it is important to me
that I get the "correct" answer
that I want to each of these
questions before the examination
begins, much less before the
treatment begins. If someone
tells me that they have a
history of abdominal aortic
aneurysm, I sit up real straight
in my chair. If I had dropped
to 98% attention rate, they now
have 100%. This list helped me
form the first rule of my
practice is: “NO ONE DIES
IN MY OFFICE. ” I work
hard to make sure that rule is
followed. The best way that I
have found not to break my first
rule is to do is to take a good
case history and do a competent
physical exam. First things
first. This is the first thing
to do: your intake process.
Non-Mechanical Low Back Pain
Generators (19)
-
1.
Gastrointestinal disorders
-
Colorectal
carcinoma
-
Gastric carcinoma
-
Pancreatic carcinoma
-
Retrocecal or pelvic
appendicitis
-
Pancreatitis
-
Diverticulitis
-
Irritable bowel syndrome
-
Peptic ulcer with posterior
penetration
-
-
2.
Retroperitoneal disorders
-
Aortic dissection
-
Abdominal aortic
aneurysm
-
Retroperitoneal tumor,
bleeding or abscess
-
Renal or ureteral
colic/carcinoma
-
-
3.
Gynecologic
-
Endometriosis
-
Urine myomas
-
Gynecologic
carcinoma
-
Urine or ectopic pregnancy
-
Pelvic infection
-
Ovarian cyst/torsion
-
Menstruation
-
-
4.
Others
-
Prostatitis
-
Prostatic
carcinoma
-
Incipient herpes
zoster
This is not
to say that I do not work on
folks with serious issues.
When an allopathic physician
sent a patient over for neck
work with two carotid aortic
aneurysms on his right side, he
simple suggested that I be
careful and not work directly on
that area. I palpated them
carefully, listened to them with
a stethoscope and worked around
them carefully. Very
carefully. In addition,
successfully as well, I might
add.
If you know
what you are dealing with, you
can make a wise decision as to
whether your work is appropriate
for this particular patient at
this particular point in time.
If you are not sure, start
reading. Harrison’s
Principles of Internal Medicine
(20) is a good
introduction. Then, talk to the
referring physician, when the
patient is under the direct care
of one. Let them know your
considerations, findings and
treatment plan and ask for their
comments. Not all will talk to
you, but it is important, to you
and for the patient, that you do
the responsible, professional
and appropriate thing.
Anatomical Tidbits
The muscle
imbalance found in the pelvic
region produces a clinical
scenario known as "lower crossed
syndrome" or LCS or the "pelvic
crossed syndrome" or PCS. The
syndrome is characterized by the
over development of the hip
flexor and contra lateral spiral
erectors and extensors. As a
result, the pelvis tilts
anteriorly in a torquing manner
and a lumbar hyperlordosis
develops. Clinical implications
here include an increase in
facet and sacroiliac joints
strain, altered hip mechanics,
and overstress of the
lumbosacral junction (21).
-
MUSCLE TENDENCIES RELEVANT TO
LOW BACK PAIN PATIENT
-
-
Tightness
Prone
Inhibition Prone
-
Iliopsoas
Gluteus Maximus
-
Rectus Femoris
Gluteus Medius
-
Erector Spinea
Lower Trapezial Fibers
-
Quadratus Lumborum
Serratus Anterior
-
Piriformis
Rectus Abdominis
-
Hamstrings
Oblique Abdominals
-
Tensor Fascia Latae
Transverse Abdominis
-
Thigh Adductors
Tibialis Anterior
-
Gastrocsoleus Complex
Peroneus Longus
Modified
from: V, Janda; Muscle Weakness
and Inhibition in Back Pain
Syndromes. In: Grieve GP, ed,
Modern Manual Therapy of the
Vertebral Column, New York:
Churchill Livingstone, 1986:
197-201
There is a
tendency in modern our sedentary
lifestyle for the overuse of
postural muscles because of
prolonged city or other
constraint postures. Phasic
muscles, on the other hand, are
found to become more inhibited
and weakened primarily because
of this use. Agonist and
antagonist muscle groupings are
defined by Sherringtons' Law of
Reciprocal Innervation. When
they agonist\antagonist
relationship becomes
dysfunctional because of injury,
constraint postures, or overuse,
muscle and balance results this
imbalance leads to dysfunctional
movement during activities.
They also interrupt coordinated
muscular activities required for
stabilization. Additional
consequences of muscle imbalance
often include ever rated joint
mechanics. This causes an
uneven distribution of articular
pressure and altered centers of
rotation. The result of all
this is once again pain
and dysfunction (22).
The "layer
syndrome" involves a more
generalized and extensive muscle
imbalance through the whole
body. Alternating layers of
tight and deconditioned muscle
groups with dysfunction of
several movement patterns are
commonly found in the syndrome.
Over development and activity of
the deep neck extensors, scapula
elevators, spinal erectors, and
hamstrings are common. This is
combined with muscle weakness in
gluteals, deep neck flexors,
lower scapula fixators, and
abdominal musculature. Clinical
implications include truck
destabilization, hypermobility
in the transitional joints of
the spine, chronic symptoms, and
the potential for poor clinical
outcome. Where there are
syndromes and muscular imbalance
patterns in general, are
identified by posture of
assessment, data analysis, and
movement assessment (23).
Lumbar
vertebrae have a rotational
range of about one degree. So
the entire lumbar spine can only
rotate approximately 10°
in total, but more importantly,
remember that any functional
unit of the lumbar spine can
only turn two degrees combined
and a segmental range of only
one degree unilaterally (24).
Movement on the sagittal
plane is limited primarily by
the anterior longitudinal
ligament and osseous components
of the vertebral arch to 60°of
flexion and limited to 35°of
extension by the spinous
ligaments according to Kapandji
(25).
The
ligaments of the sacroiliac are
basically divided into two
groups: the iliolumbar and the
sacrospinous/sacrotuberous
regions. The iliolumbar group
bind the sacrum, L4 and L5 to
the iliac crests. The
sacrospinous ligament runs from
the lateral aspect of the lower
sacrum and the coccyx to the
ishial spine. The sacrotuberous
ligament runs from the posterior
aspect of the iliac crest along
the inferior lateral aspect of
the sacrum to the coccyx and
attaches to the ishial
tuberosity and a bit down the
ishial rami (26).
Cailliet
(27) found that in people
between the ages of 30 and 40
years, the nucleus has a water
content of 80%, which
decreases with age. DePukey
(28) found that the average
person is 1% shorter and high at
the end of the day than on first
arising in the morning. He also
found a person in the first
decade of life is 2% shorter and
bedtime, a person in the 80
decade of life is ˝% shorter.
This difference he attributes to
the decreasing water content in
the disc, which occurs with
advancing age.
DePukey
(28) believes that the
hydrodynamics of the disc result
from gel like structure of the
nucleus pulposus. This quality
enables it to absorb nine times
its volume of water. No
chemical bond influences this
water content. This is because
the HNP can be mechanically
expressed under pressure; thus,
weight bearing causes the
decrease of 1% on average of
height in a day.
Discs
absorb shock by squeezing fluid
out of the nucleus region of the
disc. They also absorb shock by
allowing the fibers of the outer
shell, or anulus, to stretch.
It is interesting to note that
studies of disc fibers suggest
that they have only limited
elasticity and can only
stretched 1.04 times their
initial length before suffering
permanent damage. For example,
when a disc is compressed, for
instance when we lift a heavy
object or jump from a great
height and land on our feet,
this limited elasticity does not
present a major problem.
Indeed, when we are standing
upright, the disc fibers can
take 10 times as much
compression as the vertebra
themselves, so a heavy load will
crush bones before it ruptures a
disc compared to when there us
lumbar flexion involved in the
activity.
Fibers of
the anulus are less able to cope
with torsion than with
compression because with portion
distressed concentrates at
points of maximal curvature.
This is because the disc shell
is made up of layers of fibers
that lie obliquely to each other
in a crisscrossed pattern,
portion tends to shear one layer
from another, further weakening
the total structure in this
combined axial and rotational
loading. So, you can see that
we stand a much greater risk of
damaging our disc when we try
and left and object and twist
our body or around at the same
time (29).
Physical Examination
Clinical
Anatomy
Patients
without leg length deficiency,
level iliac crests, and normal
posture usually do not have any
significant spinal or hip
deformations. Nor do they have
many severe joint contractures.
Do keep in mind that a
comparison of iliac crests by
itself is not enough to reveal
leg length discrepancy.
Sacroiliac rotation and muscle
and balance and their effect on
the hip joint must be considered
in any functional hip -- pelvic
-- sacroiliac causes of leg
length discrepancies. A weak
gluteus medius musculature can
also cause a functional short
leg finding in the athletic or
overweight patient. A
contracted hip flexor will also
cause apparent leg shortness.
Therefore, it is important to do
a complete examination of the
low back pain patient in order
to produce lasting effects from
treatment.
For those
of you familiar with Buckmeister
Fuller and his model of the
“tensegrity sphere. ” you can
see how interconnected all parts
of the whole are. For the rest
of you, if you are old enough,
you will have to rely on the old
song about “dem’ bones” where
the chorus would chime in with
“the thigh bone connected to the
knee bone; the knee bone
connected to the leg bone….”
When, one piece of the structure
breaks integrity with the whole,
the whole is affected to some
degree. This event becomes
easier to see with the passage
of time after the body accepts
an insult.
Take for
example, if I suffered a sprain
to my left ankle, I shift my
weight over to the right foot to
reduce to pain to the left.
After some time of walking like
this, I start feeling a pain in
my right knee from it having to
carry more than it’s share of
the bodies weight. Over time
this over develops my right hip
flexor group and the left
extensors struggle to maintain
balance of the pelvis. This now
develops a right anterior pelvic
torsion and my spinal column
follows the sacral base and
twists to the left along with
the pelvic. The proprioceptive
center of the brain says that my
eyes must point in the same
direction as my feet and I self
adjust the lumbar region of the
spine to make the brain happy.
The twist continues alternating
sides as it moves up to the
occiput and back down again on
the contra lateral sides.
As the
bones shift, the muscles follow
in support. As the muscles
contract, the bones follow
because of their attachments.
Both of these actions contribute
to dysfunction joints, nerve
compression, gait and postural
alterations. All this
translates into pain,
eventually.
In working
with the chronic low back pain
patient a complete examination
is vital to any long-term pain
management. I am not suggesting
that you do an exam that
allopaths or osteopaths do, but
I am strongly suggesting that
you do a good mechanical
examination, while keeping your
eyes out and ears open for any
signs that this patient needs a
referral to another physician
while taking in the information
that will assist you in helping
reduce this persons pain and
suffering.
Clinical
Examination
Before you
can conduct the physical
examination, you need to
complete a case history taking.
There are a number of forms
available in books for this
process. I took one from a
chiropractor friend and modified
it for the needs of my
practice. However you go about
it, take a competent case
history before touching the
patient at all. During this
process, you will cover “red
flags” and referred pain issues
that are mandatory
considerations before touching a
pain patient.
After the
patient's formal clinical
history has been reviewed, a
decent physical examination is
mandatory. Prescribing a
treatment, whether a massage, in
traditional Rolfing session, or
a simple glass of water, but is
inappropriate without first
making a knowledgeable
assessment of the patient's
needs. Here, I will outline
sometime in basic parameters for
your inquiry into your patients
low back pain complaints.
Exam Protocol
This is the
sequence that I use when doing
an initial physical
examination. The list looks
formidable. Don’t let the
length scare you off. Practice
with friends or relatives.
Practice with long time
patients. The more often you do
it, the easier it gets. Make a
record of your findings, refer
to it during and between
appointments. Compare your
findings after re exams during
the course of treatment and at
the end of your work. Everyone
can appreciate objective
findings. It isn’t all in
their head after all. This
process will become second
nature to you in short time.
You already do many of the
things on this list. I offer
you a format and structure that
will increase your confidence.
Your patients will appreciate
your level of competence, caring
and professionalism.
During the
patients first appointment
several things get done: Intake
interview, taking of case
history, physical examination,
photographs if appropriate, and
a little work to give them a
feeling for what the work will
entail. Leave them happy after
the first appointment. The
first job after all is to
instill a little hope that
things will get better.
-
STANDING
-
Weight
Distribution On Scales:
-
Static
Posture: Counterbalanced Or
Tension
-
Gait
Analysis: Deviations:
-
Lumbar
Flexion:
-
Lumbar
Extension:
-
Lumbar
Side Bending:
-
Hip
Flexion:
-
Hip
Adduction:
-
Hip
Abduction
-
Hip
Extension:
-
Femoral
Rotation:
-
-
SUPINE
-
ASIS
Musculature Attachments
Tenderness:
-
Ishial
Tuberosity Muscular Attachment
Tenderness:
-
Psoas
Tone:
-
Iliacus
Tone:
-
Leg
Length:
-
Pelvic
Torsion:
-
Symphysis
Alignment:
-
Sacroiliac Tenderness:
-
Lumbosacral Tenderness:
-
Iliolumbar Triangle
Musculature Tenderness:
-
-
PRONE
-
Lumbar
Vertebral Alignment:
-
Sacral
Base Status:
-
Sacral
Apex Status:
-
Piriformis Tenderness:
-
Angle of
Torsion: Retroversion/
Anteversion
-
Angle of
Inclination: Valgus / Varus
-
-
NEUROLOGICAL EXAMINATION
-
Straight
Leg Raise Test:
-
Toe Walk:
-
Heel
Walk:
Examination
Notes
NOTE:
Below are some notes on simple
tests to determine if there are
any significant restrictions in
the range of motion of lumbar
spine and the hip joints. I use
a Craftsman Protractor used to
calculate roof pitch angles for
years to measure specific
degrees. You can spend more but
a degree is just a degree.
STANDING
Weight
Distribution On Scales: I have
two simple bathroom scales that
I have the patient stand on with
one foot on each scale. I
direct the patient not to look
at the readouts. This
information is invaluable and
objective.
Static
Posture: Counterbalanced,
Debutant Slump, Tension, etc.,
etc.: Do a simple analysis of
the patients side posture.
Photos help. Love my digital
camera.
Gait/Movement Analysis:
Deviations: Note weight
transfers, foot placement, knee
tracking, etc, etc.
Lumbar
Flexion: While stabilizing the
pelvis, have the patient go into
lumbar flexion which should run
around 90°.
Lumbar
Extension: Same for extension.
Looking for 30°.
Lumbar Side
Bending: Same for lateral
side bending of lumbar spine.
Again, about 30°
Hip Flexion:
Have standing or supine patient
pull each knee to their chest.
It should almost reach the chest
or about 135°
(30).
Hip
Adduction: Have the standing
patient alternately cross their
straight legs one over the
other. They should reach at
least 20°
(30).
Hip
Abduction: Ask the standing
patient to spread one leg at a
time from the other. 45°
from the midline is about
average (31).
Hip
Extension: Have the patient sit
in a chair and then have him
stand up straight without
bending his back (32).
Femoral
Rotation: Have the
supine patient turn the knee
medially and laterally. They
should reach about 35°
of internal rotation and 45°
lateral. Now have them flex the
hip, stabilize the knee and move
the ankle medially and then
laterally and note the range
(33).
SUPINE
ASIS
Musculature Attachments
Tenderness: Utilize
conventional technique here
Ishial
Tuberosity Muscular Attachment
Tenderness: Utilize
conventional technique here
Psoas
Tone: Utilize conventional
technique here
Iliacus
Tone: Utilize conventional
technique here
Leg
Length: True Leg Length
Discrepancy: Compare to
distance from the medial
malleolus to the anterior
superior iliac spine on each
leg.
Apparent
Leg Length Discrepancy: The
results for the true leg length
differences are negative is
appropriate to assume apparent
length discrepancy. This
assumption will lead the
examiner to the questions of
pelvic obliquity and flexion
and/or adduction contracture of
the hip joint among other
things. Functional leg
deficiencies can be caused by
contracted hip abductors on the
apparent long leg or contracted
hip adductors on the apparent
short leg (34).
Pelvic Torsion or
Pelvic Obliquity: Place the
patient in the supine position,
palpate the anterior superior
iliac spinae. You'll often find
that the low back pain patient
will present with the right side
anterior and inferior to the
left.
Symphysis
Alignment: Philip Greenman
(35) states that the
pubic symphysis dysfunction is
very common and torqued pelvis.
It is very uncommon that you'll
find a patient with a
chronically torqued pelvis who
has not suffered from a pubic
symphysis displacement. This
condition is easily assessed by
palpating the superior aspect of
the symphysis noting any
disparity in height of the pubic
tubercle.
Under
significant trauma, there can be
a total shear of the symphysis.
This is best assessed by having
the patient stand on one leg
while the examiner is palpating
the symphysis. In a positive
test you will notice and up
shift at the pubic tubercle on
the supporting leg side. Refer
the patient to the orthopedic
Sacroiliac
Tenderness: Continue examining
the patient in the supine
position by placing both of your
hands under the patient's iliae
and move your fingertips into
the sacroiliac joint space. You
should find clean open joints
bilaterally. In the patient
with the right anterior pelvic
torsion, very often you'll find
a large gap between the ileum
and the sacrum on the left side
and a compressed joint on the
right. In this case, the
patient will complain of sharp
pain in the left sacroiliac
joint space and a dull diffuse
pain on the right side.
Lumbosacral
Tenderness: Utilize
conventional technique here
Iliolumbar
Triangle Musculature
Tenderness: Utilize
conventional technique here
PRONE
Sacral Base
Status: Posterior Sacral
Base:
If you note
that the patient is unable to
raise their knees anymore than a
few inches, say less than 4”,
then suspect a posterior sacral
base. This will be confirmed by
tightness in both of the sacral
tuberous ligaments and pain upon
palpation of the lumbosacral
junction and is referred to as a
positive sacral base posterior
shift. Note that these results
can also indicate sciatica nerve
involvement and/or a hip flexor
contracture pattern (36).
Sacral Apex
Status: Sacral Torsion:
Place the
patient in the prone
position, lock their knees and
raise their legs one a time, as
high as they can, without
raising the pelvis off the
table. Note the height to which
the patient is able to raise
their legs. The apex will shift
towards the affected leg which
is the leg that does not go as
high as the other. Note any
marked difference in height
(37).
Piriformis
Tenderness: In the horizontal
plane look to the balance and
tone between the internal
femoral rotators. Then, do the
same with the external
rotators. Recall that the path
to setting nerve runs either
under or through the piriformis
muscle after attaches to the
sciatica notch of the pelvis.
Any contracture pattern of the
piriformis puts pressure on the
sciatica nerve, mimicking
assignments and symptoms of the
lumbar nerve root compression or
sciatica and abundant and
posterior leg. This collection
of symptoms, referred to as the
piriformis syndrome, is six
times more common in women than
men according to Starkey and
Ryan (38).
Angle of
Torsion: Retroversion/Anteversion:
In the
transverse plane, the angle
between the head and the shaft,
angle of torsion, is about
15°.
The decreased angle between the
femoral condyles and the femoral
head is called retroversion.
This structural anomaly is
commonly found in successful
ballet dancers. An increased
angle is called anteversion.
This angle
may also be roughly determined
by analyzing the patient's
gait. When the angle is greater
than a 15°,
anteversion, femoral eversion is
produced, characterized by the
toe- out stance or gait. When
the angle is less than 15°,
the femur internally rotates, or
retrovererts.
In the
ideal anatomical structure the
neck of the femur is
perpendicular to the acetabulum.
If the either the angle of
torsion or the angle of
inclination is other than ideal
there will be a strong tendency
for the patient to present
valgus or varus regardless of
the tone of the soft tissue
components. In both of these
cases, patients tend to try to
self “correct” their static
posture or gait. The result is
often a varus or valgus knee
condition. This test is also
from Starkey and Ryan’s
“Evaluation of Orthopedic and
Athletic Injuries (39).”
Angle of
Inclination:
The femoral
head joins the shaft of the
femur via the femoral neck.
They head is angled at about 125°
with the long axis of the femur,
in the frontal plane in the
average male. In most females,
the angle is slightly less.
This is called the angle of
inclination. An increase
in this angle is called coxa
valga; a decrease in this angle
is called coxa vara.
A quick
test that will assist the
examiner here is done with the
patient supine. From the side
of the patient imagine a line (Nélaton’s
line) from the ASIS to the
middle of the ishial tuberosity.
If the greater trochanter is
located well superior to this
line, indicating an angle of
inclination of less than 125°,
say, in the 80°-90°
range, there is even more reason
to suspect coxa vara leading to
bowed or varus legs.
Angles
greater than 125°
indicate a coxa valga leading to
knocked knees or valgus legs.
In both of
these cases, the mechanical
advantage of the gluteus medius
is reduced by changing its line
of traction on the femur (40).
After
ascertaining the angle of
inclination and the angle of
torsion of the neck in relation
to the head of the femur, you
will see that underlying what
could appear to be a piriformis
contracture pattern. In our
preassessment, we may notice
the patience standing with
bilateral femoral eversion.
From soft tissue perspective we
might suspect, perhaps a
piriformis contracture pattern,
or an adductor contracture
pattern, or a pair of short
psoas muscles for example. In
our assessment, we will
ascertain the angle of
inclination and the angle of
torsion of the neck in relation
to the head of the femur. If we
find that the patient presents
retroverted hips, they will have
normal muscle tone and need no
corrective efforts to this end.
NEUROLOGICAL EXAMINATION
The
straight leg raising test or the
SLR is formally called Lasčgue’s
test. The function of this test
is to determine whether the pain
in the hamstring region is
muscular or nerve dura
irritation. Basically, the SLR
test is simply extending the
hip, with a lower leg extended
and eliciting pain in
determining and which angle of
flexion the pain occurs.
If pain
occurs the examiner needs to
determine if it is coming from a
sciatica nerve stretch or
another source, such as a
peripheral neuropathy.
Radicular pain is localized in
the area of dermatome, but
sciatica is in the distribution
of a sciatica nerve trunk.
According to Cailliet (41) a
painful SLR is considered a
nerve test and not a muscle
stretch phenomena and is
considered a positive SLR.
To confirm
sciatica and rule out hamstring
contracture more confidently, I
use the Braggard’s test where
after finding a positive SLR.
Drop the patients foot 1” below
the point that I found a
positive SLR and dorsiflex the
foot, If the pain is elicited
again: positive for sciatica.
There is ample literature
available to assist the reader
in learning to become competent
and performing these simple but
important tests.
Two other
neurological tests involve the
patient walking on their heels
to check the L4-L5 nerve root
and walking on their toes to
check L5-S1 nerve root issues.
Assessment
As helper
of those in pain, practitioners
of Manual Medicine and others
acting with common sense, there
is a protocol we follow. It
goes something like this: We
take a detailed case history and
do a complete physical
examination in order to make a
correct assessment of the
patients complaint. This allows
us to develop an appropriate
treatment plan in order to
effectively assist the patient
out of dis-ease and suffering
and back into healthy
functioning and comfort.
Philip Greenman,
D.O. (42) reminds us that when
we
are making an assessment of the
pelvis or low back dysfunction we
need to look for "the diagnostic
triad of asymmetry, range of
motion alteration, and tissue
abnormality. " A simple
evaluation of asymmetry is done
by comparing anatomical
landmarks within the pelvic
girdle itself and lower
extremity. Impaired range of
motion is measured through
standard physical therapy and
orthopedic tests. The test for
tissue texture abnormality over
the sacroiliac joints, within
the sacrotuberous ligament, and
the gluteal and peroneal muscles
is simply palpation results and
findings. This diagnostic
process helps assess dysfunction
at the pubic symphysis and
sacroiliac joints.
Soft
Tissue Injuries
Injuries to
the muscle belly or tendon
adversely affect the muscles
ability to contract fully
because of a mechanical
insufficiency or because of
pain. If the musculotendinous
unit has been mechanically
altered through partial or
complete tears, the unit can no
longer produce the forces
required to perform simple
movements substantiated by
Starkey and Ryan (43). Partial
tears may create decreased force
production secondary to pain
elicited during the
contraction. Complete tears of
the unit resulted in the muscles
and ability to produce any
motion at all.
Strains are
indirect injuries to muscles and
tendons caused by overstretching
or tension within the fibers of
the muscle. Muscle strains
occur at the junction between
the muscle belly and an
attendant. More often than not,
this happens at the distal
junction (44). This evidentiary
usually occurs because of a
single episode of overstretching
or overloading the muscle but is
more likely to result from
eccentric loading.
Tendonitis
is inflammation of the muscle
tendon. This usually occurs
because of small repetitive
forces or micro traumas being
placed in the muscle. In
chronic inflammation, the
insulted tendon thickens. In
the involve tenderness and
tendonitis are usually painful
and motion. There may be
visible swelling in their sheets
because of fluid accumulation
and/or inflammation. A lot of
attendant, localized tenderness
of variables severity can be
present (45).
Another
soft tissue pain generator is
bursitis. The bursae are fluid
filled sacs to serve to buffer
muscles, tendons, and ligaments
from other friction causing
services such as bony surfaces.
They also serve to facilitate
smooth motion. Most bursa
cannot be palpating easily
except when they are inflamed.
Inflammation usually comes about
as a result of irritation of the
bursal sac. This initial insult
can come from disease, increased
stress, friction or single
dramatic event that activates
this process. The symptoms
included in pain, swelling and
tenderness. In chronic bursitis
muscular atrophy and a
limitation of motion will ensue
(46).
Injuries
to Joints
A sprain
occurs when the structures and a
joint are stretched beyond their
anatomical limits and this
results in the overstretching or
tearing of ligaments and/or the
joint capsule itself. It
first-degree sprained his
weather ligaments are stress
with little or no tearing. A
third-degree sprain is where the
ligaments have been completely
ruptured. His causes gross
joint instability and an empty
or absent end point in a range
of motion examination.
Subluxations occur when there's
a partial or complete
disassociation of the joints
articulating services that may
or may not return to their
normal anatomical positions.
When this occurs oftentimes
there's soft tissue damage as
well.
Dislocations occur when there's
a complete disassociation of the
joints articulating services.
When this evidentiary occurs in
the forces usually sufficient
enough to rupture many of the
soft tissue constraints
surrounding the joint.
There two
types of arthritis: an
osteoarthritis and rheumatoid
arthritis. In osteoarthritis,
development usually is secondary
to some sort of trauma or
biomechanical stress being
placed across the affected
joint. In rheumatoid arthritis
is a systemic disorder that
activates an inflammatory with
response that takes place in the
body's joints. The symptom is
pain in the joint. Swelling and
stiffness may also occur. More
often than not in there's a
limited range of motion (47).
Spondylolysis is a weakness in
the neural arch that predisposes
ultimately to listhesis.
Spondylolisthesis is a condition
where, usually, there is a break
in the pars and most commonly,
there's a slipping forward of L5
vertebra on the sacrum. It also
can occur at L4 on L5, but 70%
of the reported
spondylolisthesis cases are
between L5 and S1.
Anatomically, the foreword shear
between lumbar vertebrae is
limited by the contact of the
facet's faces, their capsules,
the posterior ligaments, and the
integrity of the annular fibers
of the disc. The integrity of
the facet relationship is
predominant, though.
Rene
Cailliet (48) has set up five
different types of
spondylolisthesis: Type 1 (isthmic)
where there's an anatomic defect
in the pars. The side is
usually seen and adolescence and
considered to be caused by
trauma resulting in a fatigue
fracture usually healing with
fibrous tissue and becomes a
stable injury site. Type 2
(congenital) is where they
posterior aspect of the vertebra
and/or sacrum are structurally
inadequate due to developmental
causes. Type 3 (degenerative)
is a result of wear and tear on
the pars and/or the facet's.
Type 4 (elongated pedicles) here
the neural arch is elongated
resulting in the facet's
positioning more posteriorly.
Type 5 (destructive disease)
this is usually a secondary
result of metabolic, metastatic
or infectious disease.
The major
symptom of spondylolisthesis is
low back pain. It is often
radicular in nature but does not
have a specific dermatomal
pattern. The symptom here
oftentimes is paresthesia rather
than pain.
A physical
examination will often show
limited lumbar flexibility and a
"ledge" on the midline of the
lumbar vertebra from both the
anterior as well as posterior
approaches in most patients.
Generally, you'll have a
positive SLR. Grading of
spondylolisthesis runs from 1 to
4. Grade 1 indicates a foreword
slide of L5 25% of the vertebral
body. Where grade 4 reveals a
foreword slipping of the
vertebra completely off the
sacrum (49).
I have
found in my work in the field of
Manual Medicine, I have only
felt comfortable dealing with
grades 1 and 2. Grade 3 is
risky business and grade 4 is
inappropriate for work in my
office. With this means is that
and comfortable working on
stabilized spondylolisthesis.
Unstable spinal fractures in my
office make me feel nervous.
Differential
Diagnosis: Mechanical
Instability and Radicular Pain
There are
basically two types of
mechanical low back pain: (a)
mechanical instability and (b)
sciatica. Referred pain will be
covered in a different section
of this paper.
Patients
with mechanical instability
present exclusively with
lumbosacral backache that is
exacerbated by activities like
bending, lifting and setting.
This pain may radiate toward
either iliac crest, but it does
not radiate down the buttock or
the legs. There are no
associated leg symptoms or signs
with mechanical instability
diagnosis. It is almost always
relieved by rest, reduced
activity, weight reduction,
lumbar support felt, or bed
rest.
Sciatica or
radicular pain can be either
acute or chronic, bilateral or
unilateral. The anatomic level
of dysfunction can usually be
assessed during the history
taking an examination phases.
Problems at L4 nerve root will
show motor weakness in an
extending the knee. L5 nerve
root ankle dorsiflexion will be
weak and that nerve root S1
ankle plantar flexion will be
weak. Regarding sensory loss
changes at nerve root L4 would
be indicated from medial shin to
knee, at L5 from the dorsum of
the foot to the lateral calf and
it does one the lateral border
of the foot and the posterior
calf (50). Most sciatica
patients have monoradicular
symptoms.
Differential
Diagnosis: HNP and Stenosis
Herniated nucleus pulposus
is the most common cause of
chronic low back pain. Most
patients are able to find a
position that gives them a
partial relief. Pain on
coughing, sneezing, or hard
laughing are sure indicators of
an epidural disease.
Spinal
stenosis of text the middle aged
population for the most part.
It is indicated when there is
progressive pain and the calves
and feet that increases with
walking. It seems to be
relieved when the patience stops
or lies down. Note here that
neurogenic claudication closely
resembles claudication caused by
vascular insufficiency. Do not
confuse the two.
Overtime to
long-standing HNP patients
symptoms slowly change in nature
and come to resemble those of
the spinal stenotic patient
according to Dawson
(51).
Differential
Diagnosis: Discal Back Pain and
Sciatica
Patients
present with back pain and
sciatica, with back pain and no
sciatica, and with sciatica and
no back pain in the opinion of
James Cox (52). The most
overlooked diagnosis of the disc
protrusion and clinical practice
today probably involves that
patient with back pain without
sciatica. Early nuclear
protrusion into the annular
fibers often involves that
patient with acute back pain and
perhaps an antalgic stance to
one-sided.
Degerative
Disease of the Facets
Degenrative
disease of the facet joints is
very common in older people and
in people who have suffered lots
of trauma. As a consequence, it
is considered a major cause of
low back pain. At the same
time, there have been many cases
of this condition in patients
who suffer no low back pain.
When the
patient does suffer from
degenerative disease of a facet
and has single leg symptoms,
their pain is usually more
severe, has a longer duration,
not necessarily traumatically
induced, and usually not
relieved by bed rest. The
people have limited lumbar
extension and side bending to
the affected side exacerbates
their condition (53).
Treatment
Low back
pain must be differentiated or
broken down into three
categories: acute, chronic or
recurrent. This approach will
define your strategy and the
formation of your treatment
plan,
Muscular
activity in is a predominant
cause symptomatic pathology.
Consequently, structural
diagnosis remains the basis of
classification of low back pain
disorders (54). Functional
assessment of low back pain
disorders is based on the
premise that trunk musculature
both supports and loads the
spine during activities.
Muscle pain is also a function
of the soft tissue component of
a low back pain syndrome.
Muscle pain is poorly localized
it has both a referral pain
pattern as well as localized
pain.
When low
back tissue is injured, reactive
local skeletal muscle spasm
occurs. This is the beginning
of the pain-spasm-pain cycle.
The chemical and mechanical
substances produced at the
peripheral tissue site following
an injury of the mechanisms of
pain production that must be
addressed in the treatment of
acute and even some aspects of
chronic pain. Alternating
applications of ice and heat
provide analgesia and reduces
the muscle spasm. Connective
tissue tends to shorten quickly
after it is injured. Soft
tissue manipulation is
appropriate at this phase of
treatment.
Exercise
and Treatment of Low Back Pain
Exercise
treatment should be a major
modality intriguing low back a
patient, whether acute or
chronic. but just which
exercise routine is appropriate
may be difficult to ascertain in
some cases. Cailliet has found
that numerous clinical studies
have verified that there is no
doubt that muscular weakness and
fatigue are prevalent in many
musculoskeletal pain syndromes
(55).
The chief
treatment protocol in managing
the low back pain patient is the
reduction of pain. In Bonica's
(56) classic work on pain
management he states "exercise
therapy is the cornerstone of
treatment for sub acute and
chronic pain. During acute pain
exercise generally is
contraindicated except for
maintaining self-administered
passive range of motion of all
extremities and the truck."
However sub acute pain, "is less
intense, therefore therapeutic
exercise is highly desirable and
is realistic for restoration of
function to the affected
area'."
Low Back
Pain and The Rolfing Series
If someone
comes into my office with the
nail in their shoe, it makes no
sense to me to organize their
structure without first pulling
the nail out of the shoe. If I
don't, they will be unable to
maintain the order that we bring
about in a traditional Series if
they are avoiding the pain in
their foot from the nail.
I have two
approaches to working with the
nail, or low back pain and the
Basic Series. Depending upon
the patience level of suffering,
I will choose either to
intersperse pain management
sessions between traditional
Rolfing sessions or I will use a
pain management approach to
their treatment until they can
appreciate and hold the
rudiments of basic Rolfing.
I believe
that if you do traditional
Rolfing on a patient to his
suffering a great deal, you're
making two mistakes. No. 1
you're throwing away good
Rolfing. No. 2 you're
prolonging, unnecessarily, the
patients suffering. This is
always a judgment call. I work
with the patient so that they
understand the goals of both
Rolfing and pain management.
They are different: Rolfing is
about postural correction and
not about treatment of any kind
according to the Roth Institute
and pain management is
specifically and directly about
addressing issues of dis-ease,
pain and suffering. The
judgment and the decision of
what to do when in terms of
these two strategies is a
function of educating the
patient, for I believe a
well-educated patient will make
the best decision.
This
decision is not set in
concrete. Regardless of the
strategy that I take, every two
to four weeks I will reevaluate
our progress on the treatment
plan, discuss this with the
patient and the patient will
make a new decision. This
decision may be to continue with
our original treatment plan or
modify the plan based on their
subjective experience of its
efficacy.
I have made
mistakes in both directions.
Sometimes I did a Basic Series
first without directly
addressing specific pain
issues. I believed that the
inherent order brought about by
the Basic Series overall would
reduce the patients suffering to
a large degree. Lots of times I
was wrong with this decision.
They suffered from their pain
complaints needlessly. Other
times, I did nothing but pain
management work during my entire
tenure with these patients.
These people wound up with a
significant amount pain
reduction, but lacked the order
in order to maintain that relief
over time. Much work needs to
be done in this area of thought.
My emphasis
here is that this is an artistic
endeavor not a linear treatment
format. The level of relief and
satisfaction from this endeavor
will be a function of the
relationship to establish
between you and the patient. It
is a dance to bittersweet
music. Take on this challenge
and you'll have sweet dreams.
Treatment Format
1. Pre
Assessment:
This is
where you have the patient
standing in the examination room
or perhaps walking about to
exhibit their gait while you
exchange small talk as you make
an overall observations of their
condition and hear their
complaints. Believe what you
see.
2. General
Soft Tissue Opening:
At this
phase of the protocol, generally
you are manipulating broad
fascial sheets and helping the
patient get comfortable on
examination table. This is very
helpful for those patients who
are not used to being touched by
a physician. Most of my pain
management work is done on a
fully or partially clothed
patient. When absolutely
necessary and with the patients
permission, I will have direct
contact with patients skin.
3.
Assessment:
During this
phase of the treatment, perform
the basic tests that I have
outlined in other sections in
this paper. From this
assessment will develop a
treatment strategy specific to
my findings.
4. Soft
Tissue Work, Prepare for Osseous
Mobilization and Making the
Corrections:
Given your
findings, assessment and
specific treatment strategy, you
will now utilize the tools
available to you given your
experience and training to make
the appropriate preparations for
expeditious osseous
corrections. In most cases,
this will involve direct and
indirect techniques of both soft
and osseous tissues.
Look to see
where there is an imbalance in
muscle pairings that contribute
to joint subluxations, strains
or dysfunctions. For example,
if the patient presents a right
anterior pelvic torsion, check
for an imbalance in the hip
flexors first of all. Then
check the hip extensors for an
imbalance right to left. 95% of
the time, the right hip flexors
are stronger than the left and
the left hip extensors are
stronger than the right or more
contracted. Make the
appropriate corrections of the
soft tissue, then mobilize the
dysfunctional joint. Then move
the examination site to the next
level cephalic looking for the
next level a muscle pairings
imbalance that overlays in
dysfunctional joint.
Look for
patterns. Look for
compensations. Look for the
original insult.
5.
Reorganize Soft Tissue around
Corrected Osseous Structures:
Once you
have made the appropriate
osseous corrections, perform
another assessment to ascertain
how these osseous corrections
have affected the tissues
directly adjacent to the
correction site. Then, balance
out each of the correction sites
soft tissue components.
6.
Integrate and Balance Recent
Changes in the Overall
Structure:
To complete
the treatment protocol, your
efforts now will be directed
towards integrating the changes
at the patient and you have
brought about in the last hour.
In my practice, this is best
affected by utilizing broad
fascial sheet manipulations and
kinesiological re education.
Treatment Protocol for “Soft
Tissue Work, Prepare for Osseous
Mobilization and Making the
Corrections:”
1:
Eliminate the torsion in
pelvis: balance hip flexors and
extensors
2: Reset
pubic symphysis
3:
Eliminate rotation in lumbar
vertebra: move posterior
transverse processes anterior
4: Fixated
sacroiliac joint: open affected
joint
5:
Posterior sacral base: balance
tone of pelvic ligaments
6: Sacral
apex shift: balance tone of
pelvic ligaments and tone of
piriformis
Treatment
Notes
1:
Eliminate the torsion in
pelvis: In this step you
want to make sure that the hip
flexors have equal tonicity.
Likewise for the hamstrings and
low back musculature. This will
assist in the untorquing of the
pelvis. Then you want to
balance the tone between the
hamstrings and hip flexors in
order for the pelvis to assume a
more neutral position. You'll
also need to open the fixated
sacroiliac joint and balance
tone of pelvic ligaments.
2: Reset
pubic symphysis: The most
direct approach in this task is
performed with a supination
patient with their knees bent
and together. Ask the patient
to resist moderately as you pull
their knees apart. Do this
several times. Next, continuing
on with patients knees still
bent, ask them to spread the
knees apart and resist your
efforts to push the knees
together. Again, do this
several times.
3:
Eliminate rotation in lumbar
vertebra: With the patient
now prone, topping the spinous
processes of the lumbar
vertebral. Note when you find a
painful spinous ligament. After
examining the spinous processes,
move on to palpating the
transverse processes with your
thumbs noting processes that are
painful and present posteriorly.
The majority of the time, a
painful spinous ligament
indicates a rotated lumbar
vertebra. In the chronic low
back pain patient, you'll
generally find two rotations,
one counters the other. This
may involve one functional unit
or several. The transverse
process that present posteriorly
can often indicate a rotated
lumbar vertebra. Be aware that
this may be a simple anatomical
anomaly. Palpate the anterior
process and you should find it
painful to press further in the
anterior direction if the
vertebra is truly rotated and
not just an anomaly. De-rotate
lumbar vertebra with your thumb
or your elbow in a gentle,
toggling manner.
4:
Posterior sacral base:
Balance the tone of pelvic
ligaments. Ask the prone
patient to move up and support
themselves on their elbows while
you work to move the sacral base
anteriorly. If the patient is
comfortable in lumbar extension,
you can ask them to support
themselves in a push up position
while keeping their ASIS on the
table.
5:
Sacral apex shift: Balance
tone of pelvic ligaments and the
tone of piriformis right to
left.
With a
twisting motion with the heel of
your palm, torque the apex in
the direction of the affected
leg. Several applications of
this technique is preferable
over a single attempt. More
successful as well.
Obviously,
appropriate soft tissue work
leading up to these specific
treatments must be rendered in
order to have any chance at
achieving long-term pain
relief. You will need to
re-assess each of these regions
for resolution of positive
findings until your findings are
negative. The correction of one
issue may affect a previously
corrected finding and
necessitate going over this list
or part of it several times. Do
not mistake this for a linear
process. It is a creative and
growing process with a life of
it’s own. You are not the
master of the process only the
facilitator of easing the effect
that the dysfunction has taken
on the patient.
Exercise
As you began to reach the goals
of your treatment plan, you will
need begin to implement the
exercise phase of
rehabilitation. This will
usually involve specific
stretches and strengthening
exercises appropriate to the
patient's physical status.
A simple muscle test of the
affected area will determine
weaknesses and strengths.
I use a number of sources
including my favorite,
“Stretching” by Bob Anderson.
I also use the Saunders software
program called “Exercise
Express.” I am fond of
referring patients to various
yoga programs in my locale.
For overall
strengthening, I first encourage
folks does take up walking.
After that I encourage them to
join a local health club and
participate in some form of low
impact aerobics class. I
discourage traditional swimming
exercises in chronic lumbosacral
instability, because the
repetitive rotational action
this has on the junction. I'm
OK with the use of the kick
board and stationery kicking on
the side of the pool until the
junction has stabilized over,
say two weeks, symptom free.
They will
need support and follow up work
in this phase. Just like folks
without low back pain, most
everyone gets a little sore
during their first week of
exercise, much less after
injury. Encourage them directly
to start off gently and over
time move up in intensity and
duration. My favorite saying
that I repeat frequently is that
“I don’t want you injured while
we are trying to help you feel
better. So, take it easy, at
first. ”
Conclusion
The field
of study involving low back pain
management is huge. There are
many perspectives and lots of
differences of opinions,
especially in the area of
treatment. There are many
differences on what actually
causes pain, especially in the
area of biochemical etiology.
In the area of biomechanical
causation there is a greater
degree of agreement. With this
more generally accepted
agreement on etiology, there is
more congruence on treatment
approaches to mechanical low
back pain.
I have
attempted to present an overview
of low back pain, where it comes
from, how to tell one thing from
another and how to go about
bringing about some relief from
another person suffering.
In learning
more about what causes low back
pain, we learn more about the
quality of the complaint being
presented. Understanding what
the patient is talking about
helps us work more efficiently
after we have taken the case
history as we perform our
physical examination.
With a case
history, we have the patient’s
subjective experience of their
lives and complaint. The
physical examination gives us
the objective findings. With
this combination, we can now
formulate a treatment plan that
will do two things: the plan
will be efficacious and it leave
the patient feeling that they
were listened to and what they
had to say about their condition
was important. Both of these
effects are very important to
easing the patients suffering.
I, dare to say, critical to the
overall process. Make no
mistake, what you know and what
you know how to do will never be
as important as your
relationship to the person
you're working with.
In my
practice of Rolfing, I do my
utmost to stick to the things
that I was taught by Jan
Sultan. I asked him prior to
taking up the craft that I
wanted to know what Dr. Rolf
taught him. He promised he’d do
just that. What I call.
Classical Rolfing. In my
practice of Manual Medicine. I
use a wide variety of tools that
I have picked up along the way
of honing the Craft. When I
stick a Basic Series session in
a series of pain management
work. I clear that with the
patient first.
I defined a
practice of Manual Medicine as
being a forum through which a
practitioner utilizing in
multimodality approach assists
patients in relieving
discomfort, dysfunction, and
pain. The particular
combination of modalities
available for use will be
dependent upon each individual
practitioner, their skills,
their interests and their
training. In many cases, it
will also involve psychological,
energetic, emotional and
spiritual endeavors as well.
I will
repeat what I said earlier: My
emphasis here is that this is an
artistic endeavor not a linear
treatment format. The level of
relief and satisfaction from
this endeavor will be a function
of the relationship to establish
between you and the patient. It
is a dance to bittersweet
music. Take on this challenge
and you'll sleep better, except
the nightmares of self-doubt
once in a while.
Bibliography
-
1
Cailliet R: Soft Tissue
Pain and Disability, ed, 3, FA
Davis, Philadelphia,1996, 101
-
2
Burns, E: Getting Well
Naturally Newsletter, Tucson,
AZ, 2001, 31(3)
-
3
Fahrni WH, Trueman GE:
Comparative radiological Study
of the Spine of a Primitive
Population with North
Americans and Northern
Europeans, J Bone Joint Surg,
1965; 47B: 552-555
-
4
Cailliet R: Soft Tissue
Pain and Disability, ed, 3, FA
Davis, Philadelphia, 1996, 24
-
5
Starkey C, Ryan J:
Evaluation of Orthopedic and
Athletic Injuries, FA Davis,
Philadelphia, 1996, 24-34
-
6
Ibid
-
7
Merck Manual of
Diagnosis and Therapy, Ed 16,
Merck Research Laboratories,
Rahway, NJ,1992, 1367
-
8
Ibid, 1365
-
9
Barton, PM: Piriformis
Syndrome: A Rational Approach
to Management, Pain, 1991; 47:
345-352
-
10
Cox JM: Low Back Pain:
Mechanisms, Diagnosis and
Treatment, ed 6, Williams &
Wilkins, Baltimore, 1999, 115
-
11
Simons D, Travell J,
Simons L: Myofascial Pain and
Dysfunction: The Trigger Point
Manual: Vol, 2, Lippincot,
Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore,
201
-
12
Cox JM: Low Back Pain:
Mechanisms, Diagnosis and
Treatment, ed 6, Williams &
Wilkins, Baltimore, 1999, 115
-
13
Steiner, C, Staubs C,
Ganon M, et al: Piriformis
Syndrome: Pathogenesis,
Diagnosis, and treatment, J Am
Osteopath Assoc,
1987;87(4):318-323 from Cox JM:
Low Back Pain: Mechanisms,
Diagnosis and Treatment, ed 6,
Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore,
1999, 144
-
14
Bogduk, N: The Anatomy
of the Lumbar Intervertebral
Disc Syndrome, Med J Aust
1976;1:878 from Cox JM:
Low Back Pain: Mechanisms,
Diagnosis and Treatment, ed 6,
Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore,
1999, 27
-
15
Cailliet, R: Soft
Tissue Pain and Disability,
ed, 3, FA Davis, Philadelphia,
1996, 124
-
16
Cox JM: Low Back Pain:
Mechanisms, Diagnosis and
Treatment, ed 6, Williams &
Wilkins, Baltimore, 1999, 35
-
17
Cailliet, R: Low Back
Pain Syndrome, ed, 5, FA
Davis, Philadelphia, 1995, 213
-
18
Kuslich SD, Ulstrom CL,
Michael CJ: The Issue Origin
of Low Back Pain and Sciatica,
Orthop Clin North Am
1991;22:181-187 from Cox JM:
Low Back Pain: Mechanisms,
Diagnosis and Treatment, ed 6,
Williams & Wilkins,
Baltimore,1999, 29-30
-
19
Hogan, WJ: Rules for
the Differential Diagnosis of
Spinal Pain: Class notes
-
20
Thorn, Adams, Braunwald,
et al: Harrison’s Principles
of Internal Medicine, ed 8,
McGraw-Hill, New York, 1977,
43
-
21
Von Korff J, Saunders
K: The Course of Back Pain in
Primary Care, Spine
1996;21(24):2826-2832;
Incomplete Rehabilitation
after Disc Surgery: Patients
Perform Poorly Two Decades
Later, Back Letter
1994;9(10)114; Gill K,
Blumenthal SL: Automated
Percutaneous Discectomy:
Long-Term Clinical Experience
with the Nucleotome System,
Acta Orthop Scand 1993 (Suppl
251); 64:30-33 from Cox JM:
Low Back Pain: Mechanisms,
Diagnosis and Treatment, ed 6,
Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore,
1999, 657-658
-
22
Ibid
-
23
Ibid
-
24
Kapandji IA: The
Physiology of the Joints, Vol
III, The Trunk and the
Vertebral Column, ed 2,
Churchill Livingston, New
York, 1974, 82
-
25
Ibid, 39
-
26
Ibid, 62
-
27
Cailliet R: Low Back
Pain Syndrome, FA Davis,
Philadelphia, 1962, 4-5
28
DePukey P: The
Physiological Oscillation of
the Length of the Body, Acta
Orthop Scand 1935;6:338d from
Cox JM: Low Back Pain:
Mechanisms, Diagnosis and
Treatment, ed 6, Williams &
Wilkins, Baltimore, 1999, 51
29
Cox JM: Low Back Pain:
Mechanisms, Diagnosis and
Treatment, ed 6, Williams &
Wilkins, Baltimore, 1999,
78
30
Hoppenfeld S: Physical
Examination of the Spine and
Extremities,
Appleton-Century-Crofts, New
York, 155-156
31
Ibid
32
Ibid
33
Ibid
34
Hammer W: Functional
Soft Tissue Examination and
Treatment by Manual Methods,
ed 2, Aspen, 1999, 218
35
Greenman P: Principles
of Manual Medicine, ed 2,
Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore,
1996, 328
36
Zemelka WH: Sacral
Analysis and Adjustment with
the Segmental Drop System in
The American Chiropractor,
November/December 1993;p,
69-70
37
Ibid
38
Starkey C, Ryan J:
Evaluation of Orthopedic and
Athletic Injuries, FA Davis,
Philadelphia, 1996, 229
39
Ibid, 207-210
40
Ibid
41
Cailliet R: Low Back
Pain Syndrome, ed 5, FA Davis,
Philadelphia, 1995, 124-126
42
Greenman P: Principles
of Manual Medicine, ed 2,
Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore,
1996, 310
43
Starkey C, Ryan J:
Evaluation of Orthopedic and
Athletic Injuries, FA Davis,
Philadelphia, 1996, 24-34
44
Ibid
45
Merck Manual of
Diagnosis and Therapy, ed 16,
Merck Research Laboratories,
Rahway, NJ, 1992, 1367
46
Ibid, 1365
47
Starkey C, Ryan J:
Evaluation of Orthopedic and
Athletic Injuries, FA Davis,
Philadelphia, 1996, 24-34
48
Cailliet R: Low Back
Pain Syndrome, ed 5, FA Davis,
Philadelphia, 1995, 332-340
49
Ibid
50
Tollison CD, ed:
Handbook of Chronic Pain
Management, Williams &
Wilkins, Baltimore, 1989,
342-344
51
Dawson D: Entrapment
Neuropathies, Little, Brown &
Co, New York, 1990, 273
52
Cox JM: Low Back Pain:
Mechanisms, Diagnosis and
Treatment, ed 6, Williams &
Wilkins, Baltimore, 1999,
383
53
Cailliet R: Low Back
Pain Syndrome, ed 5, FA Davis,
Philadelphia, 1995, 213
54
Cailliet R: Soft Tissue
Pain and Disability, ed 3, FA
Davis, Philadelphia, 1996, 102
55
Ibid, 149
56
Bonica JJ: ed, The
Management of Pain, Vol 2, ed
2, Lea & Febiger,
Philadelphia, 1990
|